Discussing Attributes
As promised, Kate Baxter’s seminar presentation is now available as a PDF from the HST webpage on WebCT.
Reflecting on Monday’s class, it seemed to me that the two presentations were complementary.
Reflecting on Monday’s class, it seemed to me that the two presentations were complementary.
Kate asked very broad-ranging questions of an array of characteristics of the God of the Bible. The link between the “central” passage, Exodus 34:6-7, was neatly linked to Jonah, but did not stop there. Jonah joins with a number of other passages from the Minor Prophets in particular which explicitly echo the key Exodus text (as seen on the handout provided).
Kate’s presentation further juxtaposed these divine characteristics, embedded in narrative, with the “philosophical” perfections we grouped under the heading of “abstracts, omnies, and negations” (cf. Gunton). Our discussion didn't probe this (uneasy?) relationship as effectively as it might have, and if you are returning to these issues, this is one point to consider further, especially in relationship to Gunton’s work on the one hand, and the Noll article from Biblical Interpretation on the other.
The other presentation chose to focus on a single “attribute” (holiness), and a single text (Psalm 99). That just began to scratch the surface, and my own sense is that many more matters were left hanging than were satisfactorily addressed. It is often so in seminars! Still, I hope the main contribution came across: that if dogmatic theology has tended to handle “holiness” in a way which distances the deity from creation, then the psalmist of Psalm 99 sees rather that the holiness of God is expressed by way of his sovereign rule.
Much more remains to be said about this particular relationship, as well as the wider questions raised, but I hope we are beginning to gain together a sense of how we can put questions of systematic theology together with responses from the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament.
DjR
Kate’s presentation further juxtaposed these divine characteristics, embedded in narrative, with the “philosophical” perfections we grouped under the heading of “abstracts, omnies, and negations” (cf. Gunton). Our discussion didn't probe this (uneasy?) relationship as effectively as it might have, and if you are returning to these issues, this is one point to consider further, especially in relationship to Gunton’s work on the one hand, and the Noll article from Biblical Interpretation on the other.
The other presentation chose to focus on a single “attribute” (holiness), and a single text (Psalm 99). That just began to scratch the surface, and my own sense is that many more matters were left hanging than were satisfactorily addressed. It is often so in seminars! Still, I hope the main contribution came across: that if dogmatic theology has tended to handle “holiness” in a way which distances the deity from creation, then the psalmist of Psalm 99 sees rather that the holiness of God is expressed by way of his sovereign rule.
Much more remains to be said about this particular relationship, as well as the wider questions raised, but I hope we are beginning to gain together a sense of how we can put questions of systematic theology together with responses from the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament.
DjR
comments
add a comment
The Trackback URL to this comment is:
http://hbot.freeflux.net/blog/plugin=trackback(48).xml
No new comments allowed (anymore) on this post.




"nice"
"touché"
"Har!
"
"So...Salavation, eh?
Is that when you..."
"P.S. It seems we're not the only ones think..."
"Yes it is rather an introspective rendering of Psa..."
"Lovely poem! Sorley has created a very introspecti..."
"This is a bit random, but Charles Hamilton Sorley ..."
"blogs were very useful in other classes, i think t..."
"Sounds good!"